Nietzsche by jdgomezmo
Reading the work of Friedrich Nietzsche we are welcomed into an armchair of volatility, comfortably immersed in insane thought. I think this guy invented superman, though I haven't actually followed the lore of the caped one.
Now the superman emerges from what was Nietzsche’s greatest work. Thus spake Zarathustra. Nietzsche, already established as a profound German philosopher, racked by illness, almost on the verge of death, speaks his last will and prepares to succumb. He is in his mid thirties. But by a miraculous as-luck-would-have-it stroke of fate, he is cured and then is overcome with the 'joys' of life. This sadly, does not last and in a few more years he is up in the Alps somewhere, in solitude, contemplating (you may be tempted to ask what exactly he was 'contemplating', I’m getting there, I’m getting there).
He writes,
I sat there waiting - waiting for nothing
Enjoying beyond good and evil now
The light, now the shade; there was only
The day, the lake, the noon, time without end.
Then my friend, suddenly one became two,
And Zarathustra passed by me.
He discovers a new religion, a new philosophy; he discovers the answers to his lifelong unrest with humanity, the human condition and destiny.
And he invents Superman.
Through the words and wisdom of Zarathustra, a close parody of the Persian prophet who spawned the religion of Zoroastrianism, he extolls the virtue of what is conventionally known as 'evil'. He exposes altruism, sympathy and every other 'good' sentiment held noble by the world's religions as 'weak'. He curses them to be the cause of dragging humanity to the dredges of mediocrity, of encouraging the great to become like the insignificant and helpless; the 'herd' or the masses.
He argues that for the human race to develop there should arise from among us a class of people stronger, braver, fiercer and more violent. A class of man that lives dangerously takes risks and explores new frontiers. A people not held back by sympathy to the weak, a people who exult in the glory of war; who conquer all before them, who will set the platform for the creation of the ultimate human; the Superman.
But the natural order of things is against the creation of this Superman. Nature favours the weak. It seeks to sustain the herd. It does not encourage individual human greatness. Democracy is the bane of mankind, for it only enforces the will of the herd, the will of the masses, thus preventing the rise of an elite class of human, preventing the progress of the species to a higher level.
What he advocates is simple. It is also kinda bizarre. We are weak. There is poverty and destitution. So instead of sympathizing and languishing along with the greater part of humanity we must individually shun the weak and only associate with the powerful. Breeding must only take place with other powerful people. Love should not be allowed to result in childbirth, because love knows no rationality. Children so born out of the powerful should in turn be groomed through education and conditioning to even greater heights, thus becoming more noble than the preceding generation. The goal of Superman is a dream, a dream that should be fixed in the eyes and minds of everybody, excluding anything else.
A socially engineered path to creating an uber-human is what his religion is about. Yes he created a religion, out of thin air, the thin air of the Swiss Alps. ‘He conceived of man as something that man must surpass’ – Will Durant, The Story of Philosophy.
Nietzsche went mad in his mid forties, and died at fifty six. His work was largely disconnected and invited a lot of criticism, yet he succeeded in bringing a fresh perspective into established institutions and thought that had gone unquestioned for centuries.
And after the Superman? After the superman comes Eternal Recurrence. When everything will fall apart all over again and the whole progress of human thought will have to start once more form the primitive ages. This according to him is the ultimate and terrible truth.
Insane or what? And I ask that in all objectivity. And also, what a difficult name to spell eh..


12 Comments:
Uh-huh... *raise eyebrow* Go study.
you call that a comment? :D
say something sensible..but yes, im going, im going..
a rather frightening philosophy, that seems relevant today.
whoa...
stunning!
it does sounds freaking...but like our dear Jack Point has already stated,it does sound relevant and would fit well in these times...
very thought provoking... and yes, leaves room for a lot of criticism...
Ah Neiztche, good stuff. I agree with a lot of his thoughts, and some people have called me an elitist too because I don't like the fact that the stupidity of the masses hinders the progression of the intelligent.
It's the human condition I guess, to give the voice to the majority. I used to wonder what the next stage of human evolution would be and it didn't take long to figure out it wouldn't happen anytime soon.
Though we have superior intelligence we lack terribly in our ability to adapt and evolve. Instead of changing ourselves we change the surroundings.
Humans have the ability to differentiate with easy and difficult and we quite often go for the first.
Technology is an excuse for mankind to feel proud of its accomplishments and give itself a pat on the back.
We, by ourselves, through evolution could do so much more, be more powerful than a supercomputer, if we let ourselves evolve.
But we don't. Instead we stick to our stupid ways with our stupid communities and stupid majorities.
Stupidity is a disease, it is the plague of our kind.
We learnt a teensy bit about Nietzche (I HATE spelling his name) when we did English Lit.
But hadn't heard of his philosophies till now!
VERY interesting!
There IS a lot of truth in what he says, I have to say, however mad the solution he offers is.
Gonna go look for a book on him ASAP now. o_O
Is that THE WhacksteR ?
Try his The Anti-Christ, He actually thought Buddhism was a better religion and it was beyond good and evil.
Good one!
Very Interesting but what's with the name man lol! need some help on pronunciation please =)
Jack, Dee and LD - well yeah, now you mention it the overtures of dedication to destruction and the overturning of moral values for victory does ring a familiar tone..
St. Fallen - true man. But more than evolution i think it is conditioning. Evolution rather, is a concept that requires species to be subject to difficulties in the first place to change right?
Maks - Yes there is a lot of truth. But it’s up to us if we want to accept his interpretation of the purpose of our existence I guess..Let me know how the book search goes!
Kalusudda - Yeah it is. Don’t ask why.. I don’t know :D
I'll be sure to check it out.. from what I know Nietzsche was a devout Christian in his youth and a part of his philosophies were an attempt rebel against those beliefs. Thanks!
Disease - well i think it goes Nee-Chee. the Chee is a cross between a 'Shee' and a 'Chee'. :D
and we aren't subject to difficulties?
yes and we have a million 'soft' ways of avoiding it like technology and other 'changes' we make to our surroundings. One can almost say that THAT is the evolution of man now..
Post a Comment